Showing posts with label Etihad Airways. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Etihad Airways. Show all posts

Friday, 2 October 2026

FA BREAKS SILENCE MANCHESTER CITY GUILTY VERDICT AS 'INTEGRITY' CONCERNS ROCK PREMIER LEAGUE

Getty Images Sport 


The Football Association has officially broken its silence following the seismic news of Manchester City being found guilty of breaching the Premier League’s financial regulations. In a damning assessment of the situation, the governing body suggested that the scale of the rule-breaking has left a permanent stain on the sport's reputation.

Massive financial breaches uncovered

An independent commission recently concluded that Manchester City utilised over £830 million in disguised funding to artificially inflate club revenues. This elaborate financial scheme was designed to bypass stringent regulations set by both the Premier League and UEFA.

The 40-page ruling, published on Tuesday, detailed how the club orchestrated a series of 'sham' arrangements to circumvent the rules. City executives argued that financial assistance originated from the Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Court (CPC) to help sponsors meet their obligations, rather than directly from owner Sheikh Mansour's Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG).

However, the commission vehemently rejected this defence. They dismissed the club's narrative entirely, labelling the CPC explanation as definitively 'untrue' and exposing the elaborate nature of the financial concealment. Explaining their rejection of City's defence, the panel stated: "We concluded that it was an 'explanation' that the club had concocted well after the event in an attempt to obscure and conceal the realities of the disguised funding scheme."


Getty Images Sport 


FA promises potential action

In response to the ruling, the Football Association released a resolute statement addressing the severity of the situation. The governing body made it clear they are watching the fallout closely and refused to rule out their own disciplinary measures.

"The Independent Commission's decision has significant implications for the integrity of the game," the FA's official statement read. "We are carefully considering the decision and its implications and will take action where appropriate."

Acknowledging the ongoing legal battle, the organisation added: "As proceedings between the Premier League and Manchester City Football Club remain ongoing, we do not intend to comment further at this stage. We will, however, continue to monitor developments closely."

Sponsors and owners intertwined

The ripple effects of the guilty verdict are already extending beyond the Etihad Stadium boardroom. Central to the controversy are the club's key commercial partners, whose financial dealings have been placed firmly under the microscope during the investigation.

Etihad Airways, City's primary sponsor, is now weighing up legal retaliation against the Premier League. The airline is owned by an Abu Dhabi investment fund chaired by Sheikh Mansour's brother, highlighting the deeply intertwined relationships that the independent commission scrutinised.


Getty 


Looming appeal deadline

Manchester City now face a race against time to mount their legal pushback. The club have already confirmed their intention to fight the charges, with Friday, October 2 marking the strict deadline to formally submit their appeal.

The upcoming legal battle will undoubtedly centre on the origins of the sponsor funding and the rejected CPC defence. Until the appeal process reaches a conclusion, the shadow of potential FA action will continue to hang over the English champions.

- Muhammad Zaki

Monday, 8 September 2025

MAN CITY AND PREMIER LEAGUE REACH SETTLEMENT OVER APT RULES

Manchester City have released a statement having reached a settlement over their APT rules case with the Premier League.

The Citizens were involved in a dispute with the top-flight's governing body over third-party transaction rules.


City have announced a settlement with the Premier League to finally put an end to their APT rules case. Credit: Getty


City saw proposed deals with Etihad Airways and First Abu Dhabi Bank blocked in 2023, leading to a legal battle around what the club deemed to be unlawful Associated Party Transaction [APT] rules.

In September 2024, a tribunal agreed with City's claim and highlighted three areas that they deemed to be unlawful.

It led to the Premier League modifying the relevant rule as opposed to scrapping it.

And 12 months on from the tribunal, City and the Premier League have reached an agreement, with Pep Guardiola's men accepting that the rules were valid and binding as part of their settlement.

talkSPORT understands that City are now set to complete a lucrative sponsorship deal with Etihad Airways.

What have Man City said about the settlement?

A Citizens club statement read: "The Premier League and Manchester City FC have reached a settlement in relation to the arbitration commenced by the club earlier this year concerning the Premier League’s Associated Party Transaction (APT) Rules and as a result the parties have agreed to terminate the proceedings.

"This settlement brings an end to the dispute between the parties regarding the APT Rules.

"As part of the settlement, Manchester City accepts that the current APT Rules are valid and binding.  

"It has been agreed that neither the Premier League nor the club will be making any further comment about the matter."

The settlement comes just three months after City accepted a series of sanctions relating to kick-off and restart obligations, which saw them fined £1.08million.

City are still yet to find out whether they will be punished over alleged FFP breachesCredit: Getty


City are still yet to find out whether they will be punished over alleged FFP breaches. Credit: Getty


For City, though, they are still awaiting a verdict over their alleged Financial Fair Play breaches.

What does the APT rules case settlement mean?

While both parties have reached a settlement, both City and the Premier League believe they have come out on top.

Given his explanation, talkSPORT's chief football correspondent Alex Crook said: "I think probably both sides have claimed some kind of victory.

"I think first and foremost, it's important to stress this is not related to the 115 charges that still hang over Manchester City.

"Because already my phone's been red hot with people saying, 'Does this mean that the City are off the hook for those charges? Have they been cleared?'

"We're still awaiting a decision on that, this is a separate case as you say, it revolves around the Premier League's Associated Party Transaction rules.


it's been a challenging start to the season for Guardiola's City side having lost their last two fixtures. Credit: Getty


"And I think the Premier League will see this as a victory.

"It follows Manchester City winning a legal challenge, deeming rules which were originally brought in, actually following the Saudi takeover of Newcastle void and unenforceable.

"The Premier League at that stage decided to amend, not completely rewrite the rules.

"City challenged again with the same independent panel, but this seems to be basically Manchester City backing away from that challenge, which is why I think the Premier League will claim it as a victory for themselves.

"You could also see, I guess, as a bit of an olive branch from Manchester City to the Premier League ahead of those 115 charges being heard and a verdict being delivered on those.

"So fascinating stuff, it's a very short statement that Manchester City have released. only three paragraphs long, the final paragraph says it's been agreed - neither the Premier League nor the club will be making any further comment about the matter.


Only Real Madrid boast a more valuable squad than Arsenal and Man City in world football


"So you're not going to see either side release any statements claiming that they've won.

"And I think this is part of the problem with the whole process when it comes to the Premier League.

"And it was something I pushed Richard Masters on when I attended the launch ahead of the new season in Liverpool last month.

"Why is everything everything seemingly so clandestine when it comes to rulings? And he didn't really answer.

"He just said, 'That's the process to agree that no party can speak publicly,' but it does leave quite a bit of room for interpretation, doesn't it?"

- Jake Lambourne